The Structure First Method
The Hiring
Structure Audit
20 questions that reveal whether your hiring is built on structure, or on luck.
Most founders believe they have a talent problem when they actually have a structure problem. The wrong hire is rarely a bad person. It is usually a role that was never properly designed, a decision made on impression, or a ramp that was left to chance. This audit exposes where that happens, before it costs you another hire.
A job description tells someone what to do. A structure tells you whether it will work.
Before you begin
Answer for how you hire today, not how you intend to.
Select Yes only when the practice is written down, consistently followed, and true across everyone who hires, not only in your best moments. Each section scores out of five. The gaps are the point.
Section 01
Role Architecture and Scoping
Most hiring mistakes are made before the search begins, in how the role itself was defined.
Before you open a role, do you define the specific business outcome it exists to produce, not just the tasks it will perform?
Does the role have a written picture of what success looks like at 90 days, 6 months, and a year, agreed before the first CV is seen?
Have you separated the skills that can be taught from the ones that must already be present, so you are not screening for the wrong things?
Is it clear which problems this hire is meant to solve, and which they are not, so the role does not quietly expand into everything?
The clearest sign of a scoping problem is a role that keeps changing shape after the person arrives. You cannot assess a candidate accurately against a role you have not fully defined.
Section 02
Sourcing and Pipeline Structure
A search that depends on whoever happens to be looking is not a pipeline. It is a hope.
Do you know your typical time from opening a role to a signed offer, as a number you manage rather than one you discover afterwards?
Is your candidate pipeline built from more than one channel, so a single source drying up does not stall the whole search?
Can you attract people who are not actively job hunting, or does your pipeline depend entirely on who is currently available?
Does every candidate leave your process with a clear, respectful impression of your business, whether or not they are hired?
Every candidate you reject is also someone who talks about you to others. Your rejected candidates shape your reputation more than your hired ones do.
Section 03
Assessment and Decision Discipline
The most expensive hires are the confident ones, made on impression rather than evidence.
Do all interviewers evaluate candidates against the same defined criteria, or does each one assess on personal instinct?
Is there a structured way to test for the actual work, rather than relying on how well someone performs in a conversation?
When a hiring decision is made, can you point to the evidence behind it, or does it rest on a feeling that someone was impressive?
Have you designed your process to surface the reasons not to hire someone, not only the reasons to say yes?
Interviews reward confidence and conversation, which are not the job. A person who interviews brilliantly and a person who does the work brilliantly are not always the same person.
Section 04
Onboarding and Ramp Systems
A hire is not a decision. It is a period of ramp that either succeeds by design or stalls by neglect.
Does a new hire know exactly what a successful first 90 days looks like before their first day?
Is onboarding a designed sequence, or a scramble of introductions and documents in the first week?
Does responsibility for a new hire’s ramp sit with a named person, or is it assumed everyone is handling it?
Can you tell, by a fixed point, whether a hire is working out, before it becomes obvious the hard way?
Most hires that fail were not the wrong person. They were the right person, dropped into a first 90 days that nobody had designed.
Section 05
Retention and Role Evolution
The cost of a hire is not paid at the offer. It is paid, or lost, in the year that follows.
Does each role have a visible path for how it grows, so your best people do not have to leave in order to progress?
When someone becomes essential, is their knowledge captured in the business, or does it walk out of the door with them?
Are your strongest performers protected from quietly absorbing every extra responsibility until they burn out?
Do you know why people have actually left, from real evidence, rather than from what you assume the reason was?
Answer all 20 questions to reveal your result.
0 / 20
Where the structure is weakest
You have just seen where your hiring depends on luck. The next step is turning it into structure.
Start a conversation